Service workflow

From CAD upload to manufacturing decision, the process stays visible.

Fictivus is built for teams that need an additive manufacturing quote without losing engineering context. The service starts with the geometry you already have, then adds the missing manufacturing questions: what process is suitable, what features carry risk, how finish changes cost, and what documentation the buyer should request before release.

That guidance matters when the project is not a simple decorative print. Hardware teams may be validating a latch, testing an enclosure, checking thermal airflow, or preparing a pilot run while tooling is still undecided. The review sequence keeps those details attached to the request so purchasing, engineering, and suppliers are reading from the same page.

Engineer reviewing additive manufacturing quote
Three service lanes

Choose the review depth that matches the risk.

01

Quote and Process Fit

For straightforward parts, the team compares practical additive routes, likely material families, surface expectations, and schedule ranges. The goal is to give buyers a clear path without turning a prototype into a long consulting project.

02

DFM and Drawing Review

For tolerance-sensitive builds, an engineer checks thin walls, unsupported spans, tapped holes, inserts, sealing faces, and post-machining needs. Notes are written for action, so the buyer can revise CAD or approve known risk.

03

Bridge Production Handoff

When demand moves past the first batch, the service compares additive repeatability, CNC cleanup, molding economics, inspection plans, and packaging needs. Teams can keep shipping while a longer-term production route is qualified.

Horizontal numbered steps

A controlled quoting rhythm.

  1. Upload

    Share STEP, STL, 3MF, drawings, target quantity, finish, and date. A clean note about the part's job helps the review start in the right place.

  2. Screen

    Geometry is checked for additive feasibility, tolerance concerns, support strategy, finishing assumptions, and whether a second process should be considered.

  3. Compare

    Material and process options are compared in plain language, with price drivers and known tradeoffs separated from assumptions that still need buyer confirmation.

  4. Release

    Once the route is selected, the package can move with revision notes, inspection preferences, shipment expectations, and any first-article requirements.

Full-width assurance

Every quote should explain the manufacturing consequence, not only the price.

When a build is risky, we say where the risk lives. That might be cosmetic stepping, a fragile feature, a tapped hole that needs cleanup, a material substitution, or a lead time that depends on inspection depth. Buyers get a decision trail they can share internally.

Start with the uncertain part

Send the file that keeps slowing the meeting down.

The fastest useful answer is often a small set of manufacturing options with the risks named clearly. Add drawings, quantities, and target dates if you have them.